How a Tax Change Will Strangle a Small Manufacturer鈥檚 R&D
Marlin Steel Wire Products spent its first 30 years making bagel baskets. When Drew Greenblatt bought the custom wire and metal fabrication company in 1998, he thought it would be making bagel baskets for the next 30 years as well鈥攂ut soon, international competition changed the math.
鈥淪uddenly, China started manufacturing bagel baskets and shipping them to New York City for cheaper than I could get the steel,鈥 said Greenblatt, Marlin鈥檚 president and owner. 鈥淏ut then, we got a phone call from an engineer at Boeing who needed an innovative, customizable basket. And that was the eureka moment.鈥
The shift: Greenblatt recognized that innovation would help him outcompete foreign companies that could manufacture products more cheaply.
- 鈥淲e realized we couldn鈥檛 thrive in a commodities market,鈥 said Greenblatt. 鈥淲e had to come up with novel ways to make a basket so that it would make no financial sense to buy from China or Mexico.鈥
- 鈥淲e wanted to be able to say to buyers, you must buy from the American innovative company, because we鈥檙e coming up with such slick ideas that our product blows the competition away.鈥
The growth: Today, Marlin Steel is nearly 30 times larger than it was when Greenblatt bought it and heavily invested in research and development.
- 鈥淭oday, Marlin is 15% degreed mechanical engineers,鈥 said Greenblatt. 鈥淲e have chemical engineers. We鈥檙e coming up with the most innovative racks and systems out there.鈥
- 鈥淧eople are showing us their operations and asking us to reverse-engineer solutions that will work for them. And we鈥檙e doing it.鈥
However . . . A recent tax change threatens to throttle the company鈥檚 progress. Until about a year ago, businesses could deduct 100% of their R&D costs in the same year they incurred those expenses.
- But since last year, a tax policy change now requires businesses to spread their R&D deductions out over a period of five years, making it much more expensive to invest in innovation.
The impact: 鈥淥ur taxes will be $600,000 higher than they should have been this year鈥攚e鈥檒l pay four and a half times more on taxes,鈥 said Greenblatt.
- 鈥淲hat that means is that it makes sense for us not to hire six more engineers. Not to buy three more press brakes [machines for bending metal parts] or hire people to work them. It鈥檚 incredibly shortsighted, a horrible policy screwup, and the ripple effects are massive.鈥
The scope: Greenblatt also emphasizes that the tax change will harm many small businesses.
- 鈥淧eople tend to focus on the bigger companies and how it will hurt them鈥攁nd it will hurt them鈥攂ut it will also hurt the little guy,鈥 said Greenblatt. 鈥淎nd the little guy is the job creator in America.鈥
The last word: 鈥淎merican innovation鈥攖hat鈥檚 our secret sauce,鈥 said Greenblatt. 鈥淭hat鈥檚 how we鈥檙e going to grow jobs and pay people well and give good benefits and steady employment without layoffs. That鈥檚 how we鈥檙e going to beat a recession. We need to have the coolest, most innovative products in the world. For us, innovation is key.鈥